As the country awaits two important Supreme Court decisions involving state laws on ,
a small but consistent body of research suggests that laws that ban gay
marriage — or approve it — can affect the mental health of gay, lesbian
and bisexual Americans. When several states passed laws to prohibit
same-sex marriage, for example, the mental health of gay residents
seemed to suffer, while stress-related disorders dropped in at least one
state after gay marriage was legalized.
Here's the research trail:
Beginning
around 2004, several states banned gay marriage. Just before that
series of bans, the National Institutes of Health happened to conduct a
massive of 43,093 Americans. The questions elicited detailed
information about respondents' mental health. (To validate what people
reported about themselves, psychiatrists also interviewed samples of the
people in the survey, and their medical diagnoses closely matched the
findings of the survey.)
Soon after the wave of state bans on
gay marriage, in 2004 and 2005, the NIMH conducted a second round of
interviews, managing to reach 34,653 of the original respondents.
(That's a high rate compared with most polls and surveys.)
Mark
Hatzenbuehler, a psychologist at Columbia University who studies the
health effects of social policies, analyzed the data gathered before and
after the bans to determine how the mental health of people who
identified themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual had changed in those
states.
Hatzenbuehler and his colleagues Katie McLaughlin, Katherine Keyes and Deborah Hasin published their in 2010 in the American Journal of Public Health.
"Lesbian,
gay and bisexual individuals who lived in the states that banned
same-sex marriage experienced a significant increase in psychiatric
disorders," says.
"There was a 37 percent increase in mood
disorders," he says, "a 42 percent increase in alcohol-use disorders,
and — I think really strikingly — a 248 percent increase in generalized
anxiety disorders."
To put those numbers in perspective,
although Hatzenbuehler did find more than a doubling in the rate of
anxiety disorders in states that eventually banned gay marriage, in
absolute numbers he found that anxiety disorders went from being
reported among 2.7 percent to 9.4 percent of gay, lesbian and bisexual
people.
The million-dollar question is whether the laws, and
the debates around them, were responsible for the change in mental
health. To help answer that question, Hatzenbuehler and his colleagues
looked at comparable groups and experiences.
"We showed the
psychiatric disorders did not increase in lesbian, gay and bisexual
populations in states that didn't debate and vote on same-sex
marriages," Hatzenbuehler says. "There were also no increases — or much
smaller increases — among heterosexuals living in the states that passed
same-sex marriage bans."
Hatzenbuehler has also found, in a study conducted in
Massachusetts, that gay men experienced fewer stress-related disorders
after that state permitted gay marriage.
In a tracking the
health of 1,211 gay men in Massachusetts, Hatzenbuehler found that the
men visited doctors less often and had lower health treatment costs
after Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage. When the researchers
examined the diagnostic codes doctors were giving the men, they saw a
decrease in disorders that have been linked to stress, such as
hypertension, depression and adjustment disorders.
Hatzenbuehler
says he thinks stress associated with gay-marriage debates was the "X
factor." He says the quantitative data is backed by what gays, lesbians
and bisexuals told the surveyors. "They reported multiple stressors
during that period," Hatzenbuehler says. "They reported seeing negative
media portrayals, anti-gay graffiti. They talked about experiencing a
loss of safety and really feeling like these amendments and these
policies were really treating them as second-class citizens."
Today, about three-dozen states gay marriage and about a dozen have passed laws that it. Some states have laws that permit civil unions but ban gay marriage.
It's unclear how or whether the upcoming Supreme Court decisions involving the constitutionality of will affect the mental and physical health of gays and lesbians nationally.
It's
likely that many gay, lesbian and bisexual people would see an
upholding of same-sex marriage bans as an example of prejudice. But it's
also possible the debate around the Supreme Court decisions could have
different effects on gays than a local debate involving friends and
neighbors.
Hatzenbuehler says his larger point is really that
policymakers, judicial leaders and ordinary citizens need to remember
that social policies are also health policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment