First-grader Coy Mathis, who was barred from using the
girls' bathroom at her Colorado school because she is transgender. She has male genitalia but has identified as a girl since 18 months and lived as a girl since age 4.
Now, transgender advocates are hailing a ruling by the state's civil
rights division that could have a dramatic impact on future cases, the NYT reports:
In a sharply worded ruling, the division
concluded that the Fountain-Fort Carson School District needlessly
created a situation in which the student, Coy Mathis, would be subject
to harassment when it barred her from the girls’ bathroom even though
she clearly identified as female.
Telling Coy “that she must disregard her identity while performing one of the most essential human functions constitutes severe and pervasive treatment, and creates an environment that is objectively and subjectively hostile, intimidating or offensive,” Steven Chavez, the division director, wrote in the decision.
Telling Coy “that she must disregard her identity while performing one of the most essential human functions constitutes severe and pervasive treatment, and creates an environment that is objectively and subjectively hostile, intimidating or offensive,” Steven Chavez, the division director, wrote in the decision.
More on the ruling:
It noted that while Coy’s birth
certificate stated she was male — an argument made by the school
district — more recent medical and legal documents identified her as
female.
It was clear, the state said, that Coy had completely integrated into society as a girl — wearing girls’ clothing, standing in the girls’ line at school and choosing to play with girls.
But the state’s ruling went even further, saying that evolving research on transgender development showed that “compartmentalizing a child as a boy or a girl solely based on their visible anatomy, is a simplistic approach to a difficult and complex issue.”
Depriving Coy of the acceptance that students need to succeed in school, Mr. Chavez wrote, “creates a barrier where none should exist, and entirely disregards the charging party’s gender identity.”
It was clear, the state said, that Coy had completely integrated into society as a girl — wearing girls’ clothing, standing in the girls’ line at school and choosing to play with girls.
But the state’s ruling went even further, saying that evolving research on transgender development showed that “compartmentalizing a child as a boy or a girl solely based on their visible anatomy, is a simplistic approach to a difficult and complex issue.”
Depriving Coy of the acceptance that students need to succeed in school, Mr. Chavez wrote, “creates a barrier where none should exist, and entirely disregards the charging party’s gender identity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment