A New Jersey judge has ruled that same-sex couples must be allowed to
marry in order to obtain equal protection under the state constitution
and ordered them to begin by October 21st.
New Jersey would be the 14th state (plus D.C.) with marriage equality.
The ruling is likely to be appealed.
Judge Mary Jacobson granted a summary judgment requested by Garden
State Equality, which had claimed that the U.S. Supreme Court's
rejection of the federal Defense of Marriage Act meant that same-sex
couples in civil unions in New Jersey were being denied equal
protection.
NJ.com reports:
NJ.com reports:
The gay rights groups Garden State
Equality and Lambda Legal had argued that after the U.S. Supreme Court
extended more than 1,000 tax and inheritance benefits to same-sex
couples in June, New Jersey was left behind with second-class civil
unions.
Jacobson, the head judge in Mercer County, agreed.
"The ineligibility of same-sex couples for federal benefits is currently harming same-sex couples in New Jersey in a wide range of contexts," she wrote.
For example, the judge said, "civil union partners who are federal employees living in New Jersey are ineligible for marital rights with regard to the federal pension system, all civil union partners who are employees working for businesses to which the Family and Medical Leave Act applies may not rely on its statutory protections for spouses, and civil union couples may not access the federal tax benefits that married couples enjoy."
Jacobson was asked to square the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in June striking down the Defense of Marriage Act with New Jersey's own legal precedents.
Jacobson, the head judge in Mercer County, agreed.
"The ineligibility of same-sex couples for federal benefits is currently harming same-sex couples in New Jersey in a wide range of contexts," she wrote.
For example, the judge said, "civil union partners who are federal employees living in New Jersey are ineligible for marital rights with regard to the federal pension system, all civil union partners who are employees working for businesses to which the Family and Medical Leave Act applies may not rely on its statutory protections for spouses, and civil union couples may not access the federal tax benefits that married couples enjoy."
Jacobson was asked to square the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in June striking down the Defense of Marriage Act with New Jersey's own legal precedents.
No comments:
Post a Comment