Now that the dust has settled from the demise of SB 1062, attention
is turning to another bill pending in the state's legislature, The Republic reports:
The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Steve Montenegro, R-Litchfield Park, is narrower than SB 1062, which would have offered a legal defense for individuals and businesses facing discrimination lawsuits if they could have proved they acted upon a “sincerely held religious belief.”
Montenegro is an assistant pastor who says that he introduced the
legislation because of cases in which churches in New Jersey and England
were sued for refusing to perform gay weddings.
While troubling, it's not the religious institution aspect of the bill that's drawing the attention here but another part of it:
The Anti-Defamation League has spoken
against a provision that would extend the right to refuse to conduct
ceremonies to judges, justices of the peace and clerks who perform them.
Religious officials are already exempt from lawsuits filed by people who feel they were wrongly denied marriage services, said Tracey Stewart, assistant regional director for the Anti- Defamation League. But judges and other civil servants are not men of the cloth, she said.
“Those are usually individuals who are employed by government,” Stewart said. Part of their public service as a government official extends to performing civil, not religious, marriage ceremonies, she said.
Religious officials are already exempt from lawsuits filed by people who feel they were wrongly denied marriage services, said Tracey Stewart, assistant regional director for the Anti- Defamation League. But judges and other civil servants are not men of the cloth, she said.
“Those are usually individuals who are employed by government,” Stewart said. Part of their public service as a government official extends to performing civil, not religious, marriage ceremonies, she said.
No comments:
Post a Comment