The first would relate specifically to the gay marriage and adoption
bans (and their constitutionality) while the second would focus on
judicial scrutiny levels for laws classifying citizens on the basis of
sexual orientation. The formal trial will begin on February 25th, 2014, but should the
motion be accepted and the first part of the trial prove victorious for
DeBoer and Rowse, the second part may not be necessary.
Equality on Trial reports:
The new filing requests the
judge to hear the legal issues in two parts: the first part would
consist of presentation of evidence related to the constitutionality of
same-sex marriage and adoption, including trying the rational bases for
the ban and other issues. The second phase would consist of trying
issues related to the level of judicial scrutiny required for laws that
classify people on the basis of sexual orientation. The plaintiffs
believe that a heightened level of judicial scrutiny should be applied,
based on the four factors commonly associated with heightened scrutiny.
The defendants believe the most lenient rational basis review applies.
The level of scrutiny applied in the case could be meaningful to the end
result, or it could end up being irrelevant, so the request suggests
that the second part “of the trial would proceed only if the Court
determines that further proceedings are necessary or appropriate” after
the first part concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment