AFER reports:
District Federal Court Judge Arenda L.
Wright Allen could issue a ruling quickly. “You’ll be hearing from me
soon,” she said at the conclusion of the nearly two-hour hearing. While
we don’t know when—or how—Judge Wright Allen will decide the case, we
remain optimistic that our arguments for freedom and equality will once
again prevail.
The Washington Post reports:
Virginia for the first time advanced its
new legal position that a 2006 referendum approved by voters to define
marriage as only between a man and a woman violates the U.S.
Constitution. It is the next question for courts to decide as the
nation’s view of same-sex marriage undergoes a radical transformation:
whether states, which traditionally define marriage, may withhold it
from same-sex couples.
Virginia Solicitor General Stuart Raphael said new Attorney General Mark R. Herring (D) had made a “courageous” decision to say that the state could not defend the ban. He compared it to previous cases in which the commonwealth has defended segregation, a ban on interracial marriage and keeping women from attending VMI—all decisions overturned by the Supreme Court.
“We are not going to make the mistakes our predecessors made,” Raphael told Wright Allen.
Virginia Solicitor General Stuart Raphael said new Attorney General Mark R. Herring (D) had made a “courageous” decision to say that the state could not defend the ban. He compared it to previous cases in which the commonwealth has defended segregation, a ban on interracial marriage and keeping women from attending VMI—all decisions overturned by the Supreme Court.
“We are not going to make the mistakes our predecessors made,” Raphael told Wright Allen.
No comments:
Post a Comment