The Huffington Post spoke to former NOM President Maggie Gallagher about Pope Francis' statement on gays this week.
Pope Francis said that the Catholic Church had become too obsessed with gay marriage and abortion, and said it is wrong to "interfere spiritually in the life of a person" in reference to using religion against homosexuality.
Gallagher uses the Pope's statements to emphasize the persecution she says she has undergone as a "traditional marriage" crusader:
What I find most exhilarating about Pope
Francis, is the possibility that we can reach out to those with whom we
disagree without surrendering principle. I will say I have not found
that true generally. I have found the gay rights community -- the
activists anyway, not the ordinary folk -- is mostly asking for one
thing: Agree, or be judged a hateful bigot.
But when you are in the fray of battle, it is easy to become fragile and to lose sight of possibilities. Maybe the pope can do things I cannot imagine. Imagine that!
But when you are in the fray of battle, it is easy to become fragile and to lose sight of possibilities. Maybe the pope can do things I cannot imagine. Imagine that!
Gallagher also says that if religious leaders move away from actively opposing same-sex marriage there will still be a case against it:
My case against same-sex marriage was
always entirely secular. I believe we need a social institution that is
about directing the passions of men and women attracted to the opposite
sex -- 98 percent of people -- so that our sexual acts do not hurt the
children our bodies create in passion. To me, that's the heart of "civil
marriage" and the explanation for why the government is involved.
I don't see that changing. I hope I am wrong that gay marriage will change that as the public idea of marriage, but the evidence is pretty strong that I am right: It is very hard to see two men as a marriage, and still see marriage as integrally involved in procreation and family structure.
Would love for you to prove me wrong. I would love nothing more than to be wrong about this.
I don't see that changing. I hope I am wrong that gay marriage will change that as the public idea of marriage, but the evidence is pretty strong that I am right: It is very hard to see two men as a marriage, and still see marriage as integrally involved in procreation and family structure.
Would love for you to prove me wrong. I would love nothing more than to be wrong about this.
Full interview here.
No comments:
Post a Comment