As Kyle Mantyla at Right Wing Watch reported
this week, the American Family Association’s Bryan Fischer told his
audience that in the 18th century, only property owners were allowed to
vote – and according to Fischer, that’s still a sensible policy for a
democracy. For those who can’t watch clips online, here’s the argument:
“You know back in the day, the colonial period, you had to be a landowner, a property owner, to be eligible to vote – and I don’t think that’s a bad idea. And the reason is very simple: if somebody owns property in a community, they’re vested in the community. If they’re renters, they’re going to be up and gone. They could leave the next day. They have no tie to the community; they’ve got no long-term investment in the community.
“But somebody that owns property, he cares, now, he cares about the public policies that manage that community because it’s going to affect his property; it’s going to affect the use of his property; it’s going to affect the value of his property; it’s going to affect what he’s able to do with his property; it’s going to affect his family who lives on that property. He’s vested. So he’s going to have a real interest in seeing what kind of policies are adopted.“But see, people that are not property owners, it’s like people that pay no taxes – they’ve got no skin in the game. They don’t care about the same things that somebody does who is rooted in the community.”
It is, of course, extremely unusual to hear any American
publicly suggest disenfranchising millions of his fellow citizens who
lack the financial resources to own property. It’s equally rare to hear
an American argue that citizens who can’t afford to own property are
necessarily less concerned with their community’s wellbeing.
Let’s also not forget that Fischer is a fairly high-profile
figure in conservative media – in recent years, a wide variety of
Republicans from the U.S. Senate and U.S. House have appeared on Fischer’s program. In advance of the 2012 presidential race, roughly half the Republican candidates in the field cozied up to Fischer, despite his extremist views.
And yet, this is the same guy who’s sympathetic to the idea
that only those wealthy enough to own property should be allowed to have
their voices heard in American elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment