Many
LGBT rights advocates considered the Pope's recent message of tolerance
towards gay priests and Christians to be quite revolutionary, despite
what some have argued to the contrary. However, according to historian
John Boswell and his seminal book Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe,
the Christian church has already performed same-sex unions. Granted, it
was some centuries ago during the Dark Ages. Nevertheless, io9 reports that:
"There were dozens of records of church ceremonies where two men were joined in unions that used the same rituals as heterosexual marriages. (He found almost no records of lesbian unions, which is probably an artifact of a culture which kept more records about the lives of men generally.)"
The Catholic historian's book was published in 1994, shortly before
his death from AIDS. As io9 noted, "given the Church's present-day views
on gay marriage, these detractors argued, Boswell's history seemed like
wishful thinking." Now, the book is being re-released as an e-book, and
finding itself in the spotlight once again. It chronicles much of
Boswell's research the he conducted throughout the 1970's and 80's,
sifting through legal and church records from throughout the late Roman
Empire and Early Christian church.
So why doesn't the Church recognize same-sex unions anymore? Any why
are the documents chronicling these same-sex unions just now surfacing
centuries later?
"One easy answer is that — as Boswell argues — the Church re-framed the idea of marriage in the 13th century to be for the purposes of procreation. And this slammed the door on gay marriage. Church scholars and officials worked hard to suppress the history of these marriages in order to justify their new definition.
Before
you start celebrating, though, know that the unions described in these
documents don't necessarily mirror the same-sex unions we recognize
today. These unions took place in era during which Europe was still
transitioning from its last years of the Roman Empire. Thus, these
unions most likely reflected the kind of same-sex relationships that
existed in Rome. Documents would often refer to the two men as
"brothers" rather than "husbands". Annalee Newitz, author of the io9
piece, also noted that "marriages over a millennium ago were not based
on procreation, but wealth-sharing." Unions like this were not always
sexual in nature. That said, the documents still present evidence that
the Early Christian church performed marriage ceremonies between two
men.
One legal scholar even "wrote a law journal article explaining
that Boswell's book could even be used as evidence for the legality of
gay marriage, since it shows evidence that definitions of marriage have
changed over time." Most of the individuals who cite religion as their
chief objection to marriage equality cite the belief
that the Church's current definition supports the same, "natural",
divinely inspired definition that it has always had. Boswell's work
certainly presents evidence that contradicts that.
Unfortunately, Boswell is no longer around to defend his work. If he
was, though, there is no doubt that he would have one or two things to
say about the current legal state of same-sex marriage. One can only
hope that the release of his work in this much more accessible and
cost-effective might allow more people to get their hands on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment